Monthly Archives: February 2015

Why you shouldn’t use personal Dropbox accounts (or similar) for collaborative projects

I don’t like to write posts on why you shouldn’t do something, but this practice has a special place in my personal Room 101. I like personal Dropbox and similar services, but trying to use free accounts to work on shared projects to save a few quid is not a worthwhile economy.

Some organisations use personal Dropbox accounts to share data on collaborative projects. This article tells you why you shouldn’t. I’ve used the example of Dropbox here, but most of the competitors (e.g. OneDrive) work in much the same way.

Free space on Dropbox is limited to 2GB per user. However, as the saying goes, it’s a bit more complicated than that.

How Dropbox works differently to a disk drive

How space on a physical hard drive works

Imagine I have a 2GB disk drive on my desk and Milly has a 2GB disk drive on her desk. We each have 1GB of data on our disk drives. Between us we have 4GB of space, of which 2GB is used. Suppose then Molly comes along and wants to put her 1GB data onto one of the drives. Molly put her 1GB onto my drive. So now on my desk is a 2GB drive with 2GB of data and on Milly’s desk is a drive with 1GB of data (with 1GB of space still free). Milly, Molly and I all need access to this 3GB of data. If I need to access the data on Milly’s drive I unplug the drive from Milly’s computer and plug it into mine and use the data and vice versa. So between the three of us we have 3GB of data plus 1GB of space.

How Dropbox works when sharing fires

Suppose now want to share the 3GB of data through our Dropbox account. Milly, Molly and I find out about Dropbox. We each set up our own 2GB account. We agree to share our files. 2GB+2GB+2GB=6GB so we have plenty of space for our 3GB of shared files, right? That’s basically Dropbox is, isn’t it?

So first I upload my 1GB of data to my Dropbox account. My Dropbox account says that I have used 1GB of my 2GB space. Great! I share the 1GB of files with Milly and Molly and they accept my invitation. However, they suddenly see that they have 1GB of data in their own Dropbox too and they haven’t put anything in yet! Milly does the same and all three of us have 2GB in our Dropbox. Molly tries to share her files, but she can’t—there is no room.

Mandy then comes along to work on a project with Milly. Mandy has 1GB of data in her Dropbox account. Milly has given up trying to get access to Molly’s data so just has my data and her own data in Dropbox. She can’t accept Mandy’s invitation until she deletes something. She decides to delete my data so she can accept Mandy’s data (as Mandy’s data is now more important). Now Milly needs to ask Molly and me to send her individual files to work on from our so we can put them back into our Dropbox.

So 4 people with 4GB of data and seemingly 8GB of space only actually have 2GB between them for shared files.

The wrong solution

Ok, so what we really need is more space. Because we we’ve introduced a lot of people the good people at Dropbox have given us 4GB space instead of 2GB. This can now work as we now each have 4GB of space and 4GB of data to share. But this isn’t a long term solution. Along comes a colleague from Australia who wants to share 1GB of data with me and I need 5GB of space. I will have to either buy new space or hope Dropbox gives me some more. Either way I get wound up and don’t have access to the data I’m supposed to see.

Part of the problem here is that 2GB is very small amount of data in the 21st century. Photos, videos, and audio recordings take up a lot of space so 2GB gets filled pretty quickly. I have a 1TB hard drive in my home Desktop which is about half-full. To really keep all our data safe we each probably need about 500GB of space. Dropbox know this of course and know they you want to pay your further storage (fair enough—it’s their business and they’re good at it).

A better solution

For a team project we need one big space to which everyone on a project has access. So instead of hitting the limits of lots of individual Dropbox accounts (or similar) we need a single big space (500GB+) of which we (and our collaborators) can access through our own passwords. A solution like Dropbox for Business (from £11pm for, 5 users, unlimited space) is in order.

 

 

  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • StumbleUpon

The deleted, the dying and the dead. Useful online resources may not live forever

There are two contradictory trends with the internet. Firstly, mind your digital footprint. Things you say on a forum, on Facebook, on twitter, on your blog etc. will follow you around for ever, possibly affecting your career prospects.  Secondly, although the internet gets ever bigger parts of it are dying. A recent frustration has been trying to find documents online which I know are useful, but no longer seem to exist online.

Gravestock. Disability CPDPhil Gravestock’s 2006 guide: DisabilityCPD: Continuing Professional Development for Staff Involved in the Learning and Teaching of Disabled Students was at once available online, but my recent attempt to find an electronic copy failed. I have a printed copy, but I wanted to make it available to participants on our PGCert course so thought electronic would be best.  I found a few secondhand printed copies for sale online, but that didn’t seem a very efficient way of getting copies into the hands of the PGCert participants. Fortunately the author was able to supply me with an electronic copy which I have uploaded to our student area (obviously not my place to put it into the public domain). One lesson from this episode has been the ease with which once easy to find documents can get totally lost, through website reorganisation or the closure of the organisations which produced them. Secondly (as an aside) I have become aware of how relatively little has been done about disability in higher education since the first decade of this century. The specialist National Disability Team and TechDis are no more. Much of the work done by the Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN) is hard to find, and similarly the work of the former subject centres is unevenly archived. This means that older work of the type published by Gravestock is not being updated or superseded. (For example the legislative issues dealt with by Gravestock are not up to date, although the pedagogic principles and practices still stand).

marsh and chengI recently struggled to find the analysis of the National Student Survey Marsh and Cheng (2008) undertook for the Higher Education Academy. I eventually found it on the HEA website under the Islamic Student Network domain with a somewhat ominous url which included the phrase ‘delete this soon’. Very concerned about this, I have downloaded materials from the HEA website in case they get deleted for any reason.

 

  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • StumbleUpon

Who is Paul Homewood?

Homewood is a climate change ‘sceptic’ whose claims that climate data is being manipulated made headlines in yesterday’s Telegraph. He has a blog called notalotofpeopleknowthat. My post-Christmas binge on Ben Goldacre’s latest book “I think you'll find it is a bit more complicated than that” set off my spidey sense. So who is Paul Homewood, what are his credentials and how is he viewed in his field of study?
To date my web search has not yielded any answers. Interestingly his own website contains no biographical details or why he is interested in disproving climate change. This is not to say he is wrong of course, but it all seems rather odd, especially for someone who is computer literate enough to run his own blog. I would have thought that a key part of the website would be about establishing his expertise. After all, even a journeyman academic (such as me) has a substantial digital footprint and I have never been lauded by the press as any kind of expert.
Ben Goldacre’s work has heightened my awareness of the sort of people quoted as experts in the press. Ad hominin attacks are out of order, but so-called ‘experts’ are often people who are selling things or have vested business interests. Is Paul Homewood as academic, a businessman, an oil company employee, a conspiracy theorist? The truth is I have no idea. That makes his expert profile even more intriguing than most of the people Goldacre cites in his work.

  • Twitter
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • Yahoo Buzz
  • StumbleUpon